By Don Dew, Sr. Marketing Manager
Last week, I escaped Denver during a fall snowstorm to attend the AIIM Document Management Service Provider Executive Forum in Hollywood, Florida. It was great to meet so many new and interesting people. I found the sessions on healthcare and digital mailroom particularly interesting – and Dan O’Leary and Atle Skjekkeland just hit it home with their social media presentation at the end.
What I also found interesting was a really healthy dosage of skepticism towards Intelligent Character Recognition (ICR) in forms processing. A lot of people have tried it but the results were less than desirable, so there’s understandably some skepticism around it. I’ll take a swipe at the recognition industry and suggest that this is what happens when capabilities are oversold.
ICR for forms processing can be an incredibly powerful business automation tool, and can drive a lot of cost out of forms processing. However ICR is both an art and science. The key to success lies in defining context. In check and postal processing, recognition rates can be over 95% with less than a 1% error rate. That’s because when reading a check and an address, you know what the fields are supposed to be, and have standards to compare against. That general bit of knowledge enables the software to reverse engineer the right answer.
Many forms contain constrained fields as well. Applying context to these fields can dramatically increase recognition rates, and then exception rules can be built to optimize the use of manual keying. It would be difficult to believe that we can remove the human factor completely (IBM makes a good run at it with Watson) but by applying a blended ICR and human-keying practice you’ll be able to greatly reduce processing costs and increase productivity.
Pictures from the event can be found on the AIIM Facebook page: here.